BRAF Mutated and Morphologically Spitzoid Tumors, a Subgroup of Melanocytic Neoplasms Difficult to Distinguish From True Spitz Neoplasms.

Drivers of Spitz neoplasms include activating point mutations in HRAS and Spitz-associated genomic fusions. It has become evident that some BRAF -mutated melanocytic neoplasms can morphologically mimic Spitz tumors (STs). These have been termed BRAF mutated and morphologically spitzoid (BAMS). In this study, 17 experts from the International Melanoma Pathology Study Group assessed 54 cases which included 40 BAMS and 14 true STs. The participants reviewed the cases blinded to the genomic data and selected among several diagnostic options, including BAMS, ST, melanoma, and other. A total of 38% of all diagnostic selections in the BAMS cases were for BAMS, whereas 32% were for ST. In 22 of the BAMS cases, the favored diagnosis was BAMS, whereas in 17 of the BAMS cases, the favored diagnosis was ST. Among the 20 cases in the total group of 54 with the highest number of votes for ST, half were BAMS. Of BAMS, 75% had a number of votes for ST that was within the SD of votes for ST seen among true ST cases. There was poor interobserver agreement for the precise diagnosis of the BAMS (kappa = 0.16) but good agreement that these cases were not melanoma (kappa = 0.7). BAMS nevi/tumors can closely mimic Spitz neoplasms. Expert melanoma pathologists in this study favored a diagnosis of ST in nearly half of the BAMS cases. There are BAMS cases that even experts cannot morphologically distinguish from true Spitz neoplasms.

Novel MED15::ATF1 fusion in a pediatric melanoma with spitzoid features and aggressive presentation.

Childhood melanoma is a rare and biologically heterogeneous pediatric malignancy. The differential diagnosis of pediatric melanoma is usually broad, including a wide variety of spindle cell or epithelioid neoplasms. Different molecular alterations affecting the MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, tumor suppressor genes, and telomerase reactivation have been implicated in melanoma tumorigenesis and progression. Here, we report a novel MED15::ATF1 fusion in a pediatric melanoma with spitzoid features and an aggressive clinical course.

Spitz Melanocytic Tumors: A Fascinating 75-Year Journey.

Over the last 75 years, our understanding of Spitz lesions has undergone substantial evolution. Initially considered a specific type of melanoma, the perception has shifted towards recognizing Spitz lesions as a spectrum comprising Spitz nevi, Spitz melanocytomas, and Spitz melanomas. Spitz lesions are known for posing a significant diagnostic challenge regarding the distinction between benign neoplasms displaying atypical traits and melanomas. A comprehensive understanding of their molecular basis and genomic aberrations has significantly improved precision in classifying and diagnosing these challenging lesions. The primary aim of this review is to encapsulate the current understanding of the molecular pathogenesis and distinct clinicopathologic characteristics defining this intriguing set of tumors.

Digging into uncertainty: a case report on Spitz lesions.

Spitz lesions represent a spectrum of melanocytic proliferations, and they include Spitz nevi, atypical Spitz tumors, and Spitz melanomas. Atypical Spitz tumors are intermediate melanocytic lesions with features between benign Spitz nevi and malignant Spitz melanomas. They often present a diagnostic challenge to pathologists and dermatologists alike because they can mimic melanoma, especially high-grade atypical Spitz tumors. Importantly, they present a relevant clinical management challenge because definite recommendations for their management and treatment have not yet been established. Here we present the case of a young patient with a high-grade atypical Spitz tumor along with the diagnostic procedure and further management. We also review potential pitfalls in the literature that should alert clinicians to the more aggressive potential of the lesion, such as some BRAF fusions.

Spitz tumor with RAF1 fusion: A report of 3 cases.

Spitz tumors are melanocytic neoplasms morphologically characterized by spindled and/or epithelioid cells and specific stromal and epidermal changes associated with mutually exclusive fusion kinases involving ALK, ROS1, NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, MET and RET, BRAF and MAP3K8 genes or, less commonly, HRAS mutation. RAF1 fusions have been recently detected in cutaneous melanocytic neoplasms, including conventional melanoma, congenital nevus and BAP-1 inactivated tumors. We report herewith three Spitz neoplasms with a RAF1 fusion, including a previously reported CTDSPL::RAF1 fusion and two novel PPAP2B::RAF1 and ATP2B4::RAF1 fusions. Two cases were classified as Spitz nevus, while the remaining neoplasm was classified as Spitz melanoma at the time of the diagnosis, given 9p21 homozygous deletion and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. We suggest that RAF1 fused melanocytic neoplasms can represent a novel subgroup of Spitz tumors, with a RAF1 fusion representing an oncogenic driver.

A reappraisal of the epidemiology of Spitz neoplasms in the molecular era: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that Spitz neoplasms occur primarily in younger patients, leading pathologists to shy away from diagnosing a benign Spitz neoplasm in the elderly. With the advent of genomic sequencing, there is a need for reappraisal of the epidemiology of Spitz neoplasms in the modern molecular era. OBJECTIVE: We aim to reassess the epidemiology of Spitz neoplasms incorporating next-generation sequencing. METHODS: We looked at 53,814 non-Spitz neoplasms and 1260 Spitz neoplasms including 286 Spitz neoplasms with next-generation sequencing testing and collected various epidemiologic data. RESULTS: In our general pool of cases, the proportion of Spitz neoplasm cases occurring is relatively the same in each of the first 4 decades of life with a precipitous drop in the fifth decade. In assessing a group of genomically verified cases of Spitz neoplasms, the drop was much less significant and up to 20% of all Spitz neoplasm cases occurred in patients over 50 years of age. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included the number of genetically verified Spitz neoplasm cases available and a possible bias as to which cases undergo genomic testing. CONCLUSION: Genomic verification may allow more confident diagnosis of Spitz neoplasms in patients over 50 years of age and avoid melanoma overdiagnosis.

PRAME and LEF1 in Combined Deep Penetrating Nevus and Combined Blue Nevus: Utility and Pitfalls.

ABSTRACT: Deep penetrating nevi (DPN), particularly those showing combined features, or combined deep penetrating nevi (CDPN), may show histopathological resemblance to blue nevus (BN) and melanoma. Preferentially Expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) is a marker that helps distinguish melanoma from benign melanocytic lesions. Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) has been proposed to be used in conjunction with ß-catenin for diagnosis of DPN. The immunohistochemical expression of PRAME and LEF1 was evaluated in 10 DPN (including 6 CDPN and 2 DPN-like proliferations with atypical features), 16 BN (including combined and cellular BN), and 2 melanomas with features of DPN or BN. PRAME was negative in most DPN (n = 10/10, n = 9/10, one case with discrepancy between readers) and all BN (n = 16/16), while the 2 melanomas included were positive (n = 2/2). All DPN were positive for LEF1 (n = 9/9) while only a subset of BN were positive (n = 6/16, P = 0.0028; n = 5/16, P = 0.001, per both readers). LEF1 seemed to be easier to interpret than ß-catenin because of its nuclear pattern of expression. The expression of LEF1 in the regular nevus component of combined BN presents a potential pitfall in practice because it may lead to misinterpretation of LEF1 as positive in the BN component of the lesion. However, a subset (approximately one-third) of combined BN seemed to show true LEF1 expression. Taking into account pitfalls in interpretation, the combinatorial panel of PRAME and LEF1, in addition to conventional histopathological features, may be useful to distinguish CDPN from combined BN and other benign and malignant mimics.

PRAME Immunohistochemical Expression and TERT Promoter Mutational Analysis as Ancillary Diagnostic Tools for Differentiating Proliferative Nodules From Melanoma Arising in Congenital Nevi.

ABSTRACT: Proliferative nodules (PNs) are benign melanocytic proliferations that typically develop within congenital melanocytic nevi. These tumors have overlapping histological features with melanoma. Ancillary immunohistochemistry and genomic sequencing are often used in diagnostically challenging cases. To assess the utility of preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) immunoreactivity and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation analysis in distinguishing PNs from melanoma arising in congenital nevi cases. Twenty-one PNs and 2 melanomas arising in congenital nevi were immunohistochemically stained with PRAME. Cases with adequate tissue were also assessed for TERT promoter mutations through sequencing studies. The positivity rates in the PN cases were compared with those of the melanomas. Two of 21 PN cases were diffusely positive for PRAME (≥75% of the tumor cells positive). Two of 2 melanomas arising in congenital nevus cases were also diffusely PRAME positive. The difference was statistically significant using a Fisher exact test. None of the tumors harbored TERT promoter mutations. PRAME immunohistochemical marker may have diagnostic value in distinguishing diagnostically challenging PNs from melanoma, but diffuse expression is not specific for melanoma.

Nevus de Spitz / Nevus of Spitz

El nevus de Spitz es una neoplasia de naturaleza benigna que aparece en la infancia con mayor frecuencia que en cualquier otro periodo de la vida. Algunas lesiones, especialmente aquellas localizadas en extremidades, presentan un aspecto similar al melanoma, por lo que debe establecerse el diagnóstico diferencial con esta patología. El manejo de este tipo de nevus depende de las características clínicas, así como de la edad del paciente (AU)

Spitz's nevus is a relatively frequent lesion that appears in children, it is usually a benign lesion and completely asymptomatic. Some lesions, especially those located in the extremities, have an appearance similar to melanoma, so the differential diagnosis with this pathology must be established. The management of this type of nevus depends on the clinical characteristics, as well as the age of the patient. (AU)

Potential diagnostic utility of PRAME and p16 immunohistochemistry in melanocytic nevi and malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) is a tumor-associated antigen that has been studied in various cutaneous melanocytic lesions. p16, on the other hand, has been proposed to aid in distinguishing between benign and malignant melanocytic neoplasms. Studies on the diagnostic utility of PRAME and p16 in combination in differentiating nevi from melanoma are limited. We aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of PRAME and p16 in melanocytic tumors and their role in distinguishing between malignant melanomas and melanocytic nevi. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis over a 4-year period (2017-2020). We used the pathological database of malignant melanomas (77 cases) and melanocytic nevi (51 cases) specimens from patients who underwent shave/punch biopsies or surgical excisions and evaluated immunohistochemical staining percentage positivity and intensity for PRAME and p16. RESULTS: Most malignant melanomas showed positive/diffuse PRAME expression (89.6%); on the other hand, 96.1% of nevi did not express PRAME diffusely. p16 was expressed consistently in nevi (98.0%). However, p16 expression in malignant melanoma was infrequent in our study. PRAME had a sensitivity and specificity of 89.6% and 96.1%, respectively, for melanomas versus nevi; on the other hand, p16 had a sensitivity and specificity of 98.0% and 28.6%, respectively, for nevi versus melanoma. Also, a PRAME+/p16- melanocytic lesion is unlikely to be a nevus where most nevi were PRAME-/p16+. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we confirm the potential utility of PRAME and p16 for distinguishing melanocytic nevi from malignant melanomas.

TERT Promoter Mutational Analysis as an Ancillary Diagnostic Tool for Diagnostically Challenging Melanocytic Neoplasms.

ABSTRACT: Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutations (TPMs) have been shown to be common in melanoma and uncommon in benign nevi. To assess the use of TPMs as an ancillary diagnostic tool, we report the concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis in clinical cases with distinct differential diagnostic scenarios: dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, atypical Spitz nevus versus melanoma, atypical deep penetrating nevus (DPN) versus melanoma, and atypical blue nevus versus malignant blue nevus. In a control cohort, we found a positive TPM in 51/70 (73%) of the total melanomas with the highest frequency in vertical growth phase melanoma cases. Conversely, only 2/35 (6%) dysplastic nevi in our control cases were TPM-positive and b were severely atypical dysplastic nevi. Our clinical cohort of 257 cases had a positive TPM in 24% of cases diagnosed as melanoma and in 1% of cases with a benign diagnosis. The overall concordance of the TPM status with the final diagnosis was 86%. The TPM status had the greatest concordance (95%) with the final diagnosis in the atypical DPN versus melanoma group, with the rest of the groups ranging between 50% and 88%. Overall, our results suggest that TPMs are most useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical DPN versus melanoma. It also has some value in the differential diagnosis of atypical Spitz tumor versus melanoma and dysplastic nevus versus melanoma, whereas in our cohort, it did not contribute meaningfully to differentiating malignant blue nevus and atypical blue nevus.

An update on genomic aberrations in Spitz naevi and tumours.

Spitz neoplasms continue to be a diagnostic challenge for dermatopathologists and are defined by distinctive morphological and genetic features. With the recent advancements in genomic sequencing, the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of these tumours have greatly improved. Several subtypes of Spitz neoplasms have been identified based on their specific genomic aberrations, which often correlate with distinctive morphologies and biological behaviour. These genetic driver events can be classified into four major groups, including: (1) mutations [HRAS mutations (with or without 11p amplification) and 6q23 deletions]; (2) tyrosine kinase fusions (ROS1, ALK, NTRK1-3, MET and RET); (3) serine/threonine kinase fusions and mutations (BRAF, MAP3K8, and MAP2K1); and (4) other rare genomic aberrations. These driver genomic events are hypothesised to enable the initial proliferation of melanocytes and are often accompanied by additional genomic aberrations that affect biological behaviour. The discovery of theses genomic fusions has allowed for a more objective definition of a Spitz neoplasm. Further studies have shown that the majority of morphologically Spitzoid appearing melanocytic neoplasms with aggressive behaviour are in fact BRAF or NRAS mutated tumours mimicking Spitz. Truly malignant fusion driven Spitz neoplasms may occur but are relatively uncommon, and biomarkers such as homozygous 9p21 (CDKN2A) deletions or TERT-p mutations can have some prognostic value in such cases. In this review, we discuss the importance and various methods of identifying Spitz associated genomic fusions to help provide more definitive classification. We also discuss characteristic features of the various fusion subtypes as well as prognostic biomarkers.

Combined utility of p16 and BRAF V600E in the evaluation of spitzoid tumors: Superiority to PRAME and correlation with FISH.

BACKGROUND: Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms are diagnostically challenging; criteria for malignancy continue to evolve. The ability to predict chromosomal abnormalities with immunohistochemistry (IHC) could help select cases requiring chromosomal evaluation. METHODS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-tested spitzoid neoplasms at our institution (2013-2021) were reviewed. p16, BRAF V600E, and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) IHC results were correlated with FISH. RESULTS: A total of 174 cases (1.9F:1M, median age 28 years; range, 5 months-74 years) were included; final diagnoses: Spitz nevus (11%), atypical Spitz tumor (47%), spitzoid dysplastic nevus (9%), and spitzoid melanoma (32%). Sixty (34%) were FISH positive, most commonly with absolute 6p25 gain (RREB1 > 2). Dermal mitotic count was the only clinicopathologic predictor of FISH. Among IHC-stained cases, p16 was lost in 55 of 134 cases (41%); loss correlated with FISH positive (p < 0.001, Fisher exact test). BRAF V600E (14/88, 16%) and PRAME (15/56, 27%) expression did not correlate with FISH alone (p = 0.242 and p = 0.359, respectively, Fisher exact test). When examined together, however, p16-retained/BRAF V600E-negative lesions had low FISH-positive rates (5/37, 14%; 4/37, 11% not counting isolated MYB loss); all other marker combinations had high rates (56%-75% of cases; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: p16/BRAF V600E IHC predicts FISH results. "Low-risk" lesions (p16+ /BRAF V600E- ) uncommonly have meaningful FISH abnormalities (11%). PRAME may have limited utility in this setting.

The Markers Auxiliary in Differential Diagnosis of Early Melanomas and Benign Nevi Sharing Some Similar Features Potentially Leading to Misdiagnosis - A Review of Immunohistochemical Studies.

Although most melanocytic skin lesions are correctly diagnosed, numerous studies have shown interobserver disagreement. This review analyzes 20 molecules as immunohistochemical markers for distinguishing dysplastic and/or Spitz nevi from early melanomas (in situ, Clark level I or II and/or Breslow thickness at most 1 mm). The detected presence and/or level of tested molecules was significantly different in early melanomas than in dysplastic and Spitz nevi for six and seven potential markers, respectively. The most promising results were obtained for 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, cyclooxygenase-2 and PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma whose levels were different in dysplastic and Spitz nevi compared to early melanomas.

Histologic Screening of Malignant Melanoma, Spitz, Dermal and Junctional Melanocytic Nevi Using a Deep Learning Model.

OBJECTIVE: The integration of an artificial intelligence tool into pathologists' workflow may lead to a more accurate and timely diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, directly patient care. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate the performance of such a model in achieving clinical-grade diagnoses of Spitz nevi, dermal and junctional melanocytic nevi, and melanomas. METHODS: We created a beginner-level training environment by teaching our algorithm to perform cytologic inferences on 136,216 manually annotated tiles of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides consisting of unequivocal melanocytic nevi, Spitz nevi, and invasive melanoma cases. We sequentially trained and tested our network to provide a final diagnosis-classification on 39 cases in total. Positive predictive value (precision) and sensitivity (recall) were used to measure our performance. RESULTS: The tile-classification algorithm predicted the 136,216 irrelevant, melanoma, melanocytic nevi, and Spitz nevi tiles at sensitivities of 96%, 93%, 94% and 73%, respectively. The final trained model was able to correctly classify and predict the correct diagnosis in 85.7% of unseen cases (n = 28), reporting at or near screening-level performances for precision and recall of melanoma (76.2%, 100.0%), melanocytic nevi (100.0%, 75.0%), and Spitz nevi (100.0%, 75.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot study proves that convolutional networks trained on cellular morphology to classify melanocytic proliferations can be used as a powerful tool to assist pathologists in screening for melanoma versus other benign lesions.

Next-generation sequencing improves agreement and accuracy in the diagnosis of Spitz and spitzoid melanocytic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms can be challenging to diagnose on histopathology alone. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers promise as a valuable aid in the diagnosis. Recently, one study reported increased inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms among 20 expert melanoma pathologists after incorporating NGS data. We hypothesized that NGS would carry a similar utility in a broader group of dermatopathologists and general pathologists. METHODS: Sixty-three participants of a live online (www.Dermpedia.org) CME course rendered a diagnosis on 70 cases composed of melanocytic neoplasms with spitzoid features. In Survey 1, cases included H&E slides and demographic information only, while Survey 2 included NGS data. RESULTS: With NGS information, inter-rater agreement significantly improved from "fair" to "almost perfect" and from "fair" to "substantial" for categorizing lesions as Spitz versus non-Spitz and conventional melanoma versus not, respectively. There was also an increase in diagnostic accuracy, evidenced by improved recognition of three metastatic tumors as being conventional melanomas. CONCLUSION: The study supports the adoption of NGS as a valuable diagnostic adjunct for both expert and broader dermatopathologists in their assessments of spitzoid neoplasms.